PoetryPlayer - Devising a Poetry App for Pupils

Crowd-sourcing ideas from pupils and teachers

EMC has a small grant from the Clore-Duffield Foundation to explore the potential for engaging young people with poetry through smart phone apps of some kind.

Building a video-based app is not a straightforward business as there are so many different varieties of smart phones. So our first task is to try and get answers to a few basic questions.

Question 1

Would young people be prepared to use smart phones at all to access video poems?

Question 2

What kind of poems would appeal to young people between the ages of 11 and 19?

Creating an app can be quite an expensive business so we have 'mocked-up' two ways of accessing a 'would be' app. One on the web and one via smart phones using a Youtube Channel.

I would be very grateful to any teachers who would be prepared to set their students a homework along the following lines (homework because so many schools block Vimeo and Youtube and we would like to know if pupils will access video poems in their own time)

Deadline for responses will be April 30th but March 31st would be ideal.

Using the Poetry Station Website on a PC at http://www.poetrystation.org.uk

Click the PoetryPlayer icon top right to generate a collection of 23 poems.

Using a smart phone to access The Poetry Channel

Youtube URL http://www.youtube.com/user/poetrychannelwebsite

This will generate the same collection as the Poetry Station but will be called The Poetry Channel. This can also be accessed using the search term: poetrychannelwebsite

The first option is included so that pupils who do not have smart phones are not excluded from the project. Please feel free to respond as teachers on the blog or join a conversation on Twitter with #emcpoems

You can download the Poetry Player worksheet (word file, please feel free to adapt) here

All comments on Youtube and the web will be moderated. If you have any queries or suggestions do feel free to email me directly michael@englishandmedia.co.uk

The Homework – Poetry for Pleasure

Draft worksheet for Pupils

Your homework is to spend 20 minutes looking at some video poems on the web.

Method 1

Visit The Poetry Station on your PC http://www.poetrystation.org.uk

Click on the PoetryPlayer icon top right to display 23 poems

Method 2

Go to Youtube on your smartphone

http://www.youtube.com/user/poetrychannelwebsite

which will display the same 23 poems.

You can also use the search term: poetrychannelwebsite

If you are using Youtube on a smart phone you may need to keep returning to poetrychannelwebsite to stay with the 23 poems

Play through at least 10 poems that take your fancy and then choose your three favourites poems.

Please write a brief comment on your three favourite poems. Start your comment with letters PP and include your name, school and age at the end. You can add the comments on the Youtube Channel or on the Poetry Station website.

If you prefer you can Tweet your comments using this hashtag #emcpoems

Do you have time to add any further comments?

What else would you like to see or do on a Poetry website or app? Here is a list of possible ideas. Please feel free to add your own ideas.

1 Be able to make and upload my own poem

2 Hear more from the poets about how they wrote their poem

3 Get advice from a poet on how to go about writing my own poems

4 View a range of pictures or videos to get me started on my own poems

5 Any other poets you would like to see on this site?

6 Other suggestions

Hard Times Ahead

Why not take 3 minutes of your time to read, or reread, this extract from Chapter 2 of Hard Times. The scene is a plain, bare, monotonous vault of a school-room. In the room are three men apart from the pupils - Mr Gradgrind, the head teacher, a school inspector, and the teacher, Mr M'Choakumchild. Sissy Jupe, whose father is a horse trainer, has just failed to define a horse as 'gramnivorous quadruped'. Dickens now introduces the school inspector. There is, of course, no suggestion that anything like these views could be prevailing in the year 2012.

Extract from Chapter Two of Hard Times

The third gentleman now stepped forth. A mighty man at cutting and drying, he was; a government officer; in his way (and in most other people's too), a professed pugilist; always in training, always with a system to force down the general throat like a bolus, always to be heard of at the bar of his little Public-office, ready to fight all England. To continue in fistic phraseology, he had a genius for coming up to the scratch, wherever and whatever it was, and proving himself an ugly customer. He would go in and damage any subject whatever with his right, follow up with his left, stop, exchange, counter, bore his opponent (he always fought All England) to the ropes, and fall upon him neatly. He was certain to knock the wind out of common sense, and render that unlucky adversary deaf to the call of time. And he had it in charge from high authority to bring about the great public-office Millennium, when Commissioners should reign upon earth.
'Very well,' said this gentleman, briskly smiling, and folding his arms. 'That's a horse. Now, let me ask you girls and boys, Would you paper a room with representations of horses?'
After a pause, one half of the children cried in chorus, 'Yes, sir!' Upon which the other half, seeing in the gentleman's face that Yes was wrong, cried out in chorus, 'No, sir!' - as the custom is, in these examinations.
'Of course, No. Why wouldn't you?'
A pause. One corpulent slow boy, with a wheezy manner of breathing, ventured the answer, Because he wouldn't paper a room at all, but would paint it.
'You must paper it,' said the gentleman, rather warmly.
'You must paper it,' said Thomas Gradgrind, 'whether you like it or not. Don't tell us you wouldn't paper it. What do you mean, boy?'
'I'll explain to you, then,' said the gentleman, after another and a dismal pause, 'why you wouldn't paper a room with representations of horses. Do you ever see horses walking up and down the sides of rooms in reality - in fact? Do you?'
'Yes, sir!' from one half. 'No, sir!' from the other.
'Of course no,' said the gentleman, with an indignant look at the wrong half. 'Why, then, you are not to see anywhere, what you don't see in fact; you are not to have anywhere, what you don't have in fact. What is called Taste, is only another name for Fact.' Thomas Gradgrind nodded his approbation.
'This is a new principle, a discovery, a great discovery,' said the gentleman. 'Now, I'll try you again. Suppose you were going to carpet a room. Would you use a carpet having a representation of flowers upon it?'
There being a general conviction by this time that 'No, sir!' was always the right answer to this gentleman, the chorus of NO was very strong. Only a few feeble stragglers said Yes: among them Sissy Jupe.
'Girl number twenty,' said the gentleman, smiling in the calm strength of knowledge.
Sissy blushed, and stood up.
'So you would carpet your room - or your husband's room, if you were a grown woman, and had a husband - with representations of flowers, would you?' said the gentleman. 'Why would you?'
'If you please, sir, I am very fond of flowers,' returned the girl.
'And is that why you would put tables and chairs upon them, and have people walking over them with heavy boots?'
'It wouldn't hurt them, sir. They wouldn't crush and wither, if you please, sir. They would be the pictures of what was very pretty and pleasant, and I would fancy - '
'Ay, ay, ay! But you mustn't fancy,' cried the gentleman, quite elated by coming so happily to his point. 'That's it! You are never to fancy.'
'You are not, Cecilia Jupe,' Thomas Gradgrind solemnly repeated, 'to do anything of that kind.'
'Fact, fact, fact!' said the gentleman. And 'Fact, fact, fact!' repeated Thomas Gradgrind.
'You are to be in all things regulated and governed,' said the gentleman, 'by fact. We hope to have, before long, a board of fact, composed of commissioners of fact, who will force the people to be a people of fact, and of nothing but fact. You must discard the word Fancy altogether. You have nothing to do with it. You are not to have, in any object of use or ornament, what would be a contradiction in fact. You don't walk upon flowers in fact; you cannot be allowed to walk upon flowers in carpets. You don't find that foreign birds and butterflies come and perch upon your crockery; you cannot be permitted to paint foreign birds and butterflies upon your crockery. You never meet with quadrupeds going up and down walls; you must not have quadrupeds represented upon walls. You must use,' said the gentleman, 'for all these purposes, combinations and modifications (in primary colours) of mathematical figures which are susceptible of proof and demonstration. This is the new discovery. This is fact. This is taste.'
The girl curtseyed, and sat down. She was very young, and she looked as if she were frightened by the matter-of-fact prospect the world afforded.
'Now, if Mr. M'Choakumchild,' said the gentleman, 'will proceed to give his first lesson here, Mr. Gradgrind, I shall be happy, at your request, to observe his mode of procedure.'
Mr. Gradgrind was much obliged. 'Mr. M'Choakumchild, we only wait for you.'
So, Mr. M'Choakumchild began in his best manner. He and some one hundred and forty other schoolmasters, had been lately turned at the same time, in the same factory, on the same principles, like so many pianoforte legs. He had been put through an immense variety of paces, and had answered volumes of head-breaking questions. Orthography, etymology, syntax, and prosody, biography, astronomy, geography, and general cosmography, the sciences of compound proportion, algebra, land-surveying and levelling, vocal music, and drawing from models, were all at the ends of his ten chilled fingers. He had worked his stony way into Her Majesty's most Honourable Privy Council's Schedule B, and had taken the bloom off the higher branches of mathematics and physical science, French, German, Latin, and Greek. He knew all about all the Water Sheds of all the world (whatever they are), and all the histories of all the peoples, and all the names of all the rivers and mountains, and all the productions, manners, and customs of all the countries, and all their boundaries and bearings on the two and thirty points of the compass. Ah, rather overdone, M'Choakumchild. If he had only learnt a little less, how infinitely better he might have taught much more!
He went to work in this preparatory lesson, not unlike Morgiana in the Forty Thieves: looking into all the vessels ranged before him, one after another, to see what they contained. Say, good M'Choakumchild. When from thy boiling store, thou shalt fill each jar brim full by-and-by, dost thou think that thou wilt always kill outright the robber Fancy lurking within - or sometimes only maim him and distort him!

Moving image and multimodal texts in the new English GCSE specs: Part 1

By now we hope the dust has settled and that you’ll have chosen your new GCSE specs and be well on the way to plotting a manageable route through for your next year 10 cohort. We thought this might be a good time to highlight some of the more positive and creative aspects offered by the new specs for the integration of media and multimodal approaches – to which they are all at least notionally committed - and their implications.

This blog will offer a summary of exactly where to find the media and multimodal opportunities in your own chosen specs, organised by Awarding Body for ease of reference.

In our next instalment we’ll suggest some of the sorts of media and multimodal activities you could explore in preparation for both the Controlled Assessment Tasks, and for the externally assessed exams.

Click on the links below to take you direct to your chosen specification.

AQA
EDEXCEL
OCR
WJEC

GCSE 2010 Summary Grids (7 pages)

After running our Choosing and Planning course five times at the Centre, our summary and comparative grids have been well and truly honed. Thanks to all the course participants who pointed out the odd anomaly or suggested a clearer way of presenting the information. The grids are all the better for their input. Nonetheless, they come with our usual health warning – always check back with the full spec before making a final decision or beginning course planning.

For those of you still grappling with 12 specs or agonising over which route to take, the Awarding Body summaries condense onto one page, the different offers of each Board. The comparative grids take each subject in turn to highlight the ways in which each Awarding Body has tackled key aspects of the subject. This is where to go if, for example, you want a quick overview of how non-fiction or Shakespeare has been covered for English by each Awarding Body, or which Awarding Bodies test Shakespeare in Controlled Assessment rather than exam.

For those of you who have taken the plunge already we hope you will find the grids a useful aide memoire for the specs you have opted for.

Click here to view the summary grids: http://www.englishandmedia.org.uk/blog/EMCGCSE2010grids.pdf

EMC/GCSE 2010 Blog 8: Controlled Assessment in the Accredited Specifications

Controlled Assessment in the Accredited Specifications

What is controlled assessment?
Controlled assessment is a half-way house between coursework and exam work.

Controlled assessment breaks down into several stages: task setting; research and preparation; task taking.

The early stages are more like coursework, with students getting the question in advance and teachers able to use any of their usual preparation methods although this does not include commenting on drafts or giving detailed feedback to individual students.

However, in the writing up or ‘task taking ‘stage, students must work under close supervision. At this stage, students cannot have further help either from their teachers or from their peers and may not hand in drafts to be commented on (although they can use the time for their own drafting and re-drafting process if they wish). Any drafting completed during the Controlled Assessment session must be handed in with the final piece.

For more details on the basics, see our previous blog on controlled assessment:
http://www.englishandmedia.org.uk/blog/EMCGCSE2010_Blog2.pdf

Did you realise?
• Teachers and therefore students will know the question in advance.

Generally speaking the controlled assessment tasks will be released in April, for completion by the following June. You may share the task with students at any stage, but it is most likely that you will do this during the research and preparation stage. The task must be submitted in the same academic year it is set, i.e. tasks released in April must be completed by the following June. Tasks will change each year. Do check the arrangements for individual awarding bodies, particularly for the first cohort, as there are some variations in when the first round of tasks are being released, how long they are valid for and when they can be submitted.

• Although questions are set by the Awarding Body, there is flexibility for teachers to customise the question. The extent to which this is possible varies between Awarding Bodies and from task to task. For example, in approaching a Shakespeare task for literature:
- AQA and WJEC take a similar approach: the Awarding Body sets generic tasks and gives examples of how these tasks can be applied to particular texts. The teacher may use an example, or customise the question for the text they have chosen and the students they are teaching. In an example from AQA, the generic question might be ‘Explore the ways texts develop ideas about people in love’. One of the examples given is then ‘How do Shakespeare and Wilde explore for comic effect the absurdities of people in love in Twelfth Night and The Importance of Being Earnest.’
- OCR has two different types of question in their specifications: generic and specific. For the Shakespeare section, a choice of texts is given and, for each text, one task which asks students to compare a particular scene in the play with one of the suggested audio or film versions of that scene. Teachers are free, however, to get a different text approved by the Awarding Body, in which case students will answer one of the two generic questions.
- Edexcel sets a series of generic questions for Shakespeare. Teachers choose a text and an appropriate question. An example question might be: ‘Explore the ways in which a dramatic device is used to engage the audience in two interpretations (e.g. a reading and a performance) of the Shakespeare play you have studied’.

• In the preparation and research stages, the teacher can use all the methods they would normally use for coursework to prepare students for the task. This could include oral, group and drama work, watching the film, modelled, shared and guided writing and so on.

• Students have quite a long time for the ‘task taking’, or writing up stage.
In most cases, around 3-4 hours. This should give them time for some re-drafting, although they must do this without help. For a helpful summary of the guidance on timing from each board, see our chart: http://www.englishandmedia.org.uk/blog/CAtimings.pdf

• Students are allowed to take in one sheet of A4 notes at the task taking stage. This must not include a one-size-fits-all set of teacher prompts, a writing frame, essay plan, or draft essay and must be handed in with the task. You will want to think carefully about what kind of thing might be useful to your students. A few suggestions: a mind map; ‘success criteria’ for the task, perhaps taken from a teacher checklist but personalised for that student; key quotes – even if they are allowed to take the text into a reading/literature task, it could be useful for them to have collected some quotes, to save time.

• Students can take the task at any time of the year and in normal lesson time, although they could also take the task in one block and in the exam hall. If they are to use normal lesson time, you will need somewhere secure to store work between sessions. Controlled assessment work must also be stored securely between completion and moderation. As they are not allowed any help, sessions do not need to be invigilated be an English teacher.

• Students can use ICT for the task taking stage. In practice this may be difficult, with problems around access to computers, disenabling forbidden tools (in some tasks students are not allowed Internet access, in others they are not allowed to use spell checks or thesauruses), and ensuring that students cannot access their work between sessions if the task is completed over several sessions. It might be more manageable to allow all students computer access for one of their tasks (remember you do not have to have all students taking the task at the same time and can split the time up into shorter sessions).

• No awarding body has been allowed to retain an option for an oral response to a controlled assessment task, either to reading or to the study of spoken language.



Some issues you may want to consider as you plan a controlled assessment task:
• The time recommended for preparation and teaching and the different levels of ‘control’ at each stage.
• The proportion of the course it represents.
• The assessment objectives for this task and how to share these with students.
• Whether individual teachers are to be free to choose their own task from the awarding body’s selection, or whether you will agree a common task for the department.
• Whether you will you allow any level of choice for your students.
• How to teach your students to use the A4 sheet of notes effectively.
• Links to other aspects of the specification (for example a discussion on a text in the preparation stage could be assessed for speaking and listening)
• How you might use multimodal texts. All boards encourage this in the preparation stage, and many of the reading tasks ask students to compare film, audio or performance versions with the written version of a text. Multimodal texts are also excellent stimulus for writing. Edexcel’s pre-release non-fiction anthology includes multimodal texts.
• Whether you will take advantage of any opportunities for students to make a multimodal response. Both Edexcel and AQA offer the option of a ‘multi-modal’ response in some controlled assessment tasks, for example students might choose images to accompany a poetry text and then write a commentary explaining their choices.
• What is the school policy going to be on students who are absent or who finish very quickly?
• Will students take the task in the hall/in their classroom/ with their teacher/ with an invigilator? In one block of time or several? Pros of the exam hall approach include: could use invigilators instead of English teachers; might make students take the task more seriously; momentum and support built up by all preparing and taking the task at the same time; less temptation for teachers to bend the rules on helping. Pros of the classroom approach include: classes can take the task at different times allowing resources to be rotated, providing an alternative time for an absent student to sit a task, and making computer access more possible; some students will perform better if the time is broken up into shorter chunks; some students panic in the exam hall; research suggests people remember what they have learned better if they are tested in the room where they did the learning.
• How will you organise access to: ICT; clean copies of texts; dictionaries and thesauruses?

Remember that colleagues in other subjects have already taught controlled assessment, and may already have solutions or have contributed to whole school policy on some of the tricky issues, such as how to deal with students who are absent.

The English and Media Centre will be running a course in the autumn term on managing the controlled assessment tasks.

EMC/GCSE 2010 Blog 7: Choosing Your English GCSE Specification for 2010

Now that the specifications have been accredited and are about to arrive in schools, you are probably getting to the stage of wanting to firm up your choice.

In this blog we will be considering some common concerns and how they have been addressed by the different Awarding Bodies. We’ll be doing this by posing some questions you might like to ask as you consider which specification might best suit your department and your students.

Some questions you might ask to help you to choose your specification…

The non-fiction reading exam: do my candidates struggle with the non-fiction comprehension?
- Edexcel is the only spec with non-fiction in controlled assessment with tasks set on pre-release materials (so no unseen element).
- AQA signals a predictable questioning pattern, making it easier to ‘coach’ students.
- OCR does not ask students to compare texts in the non-fiction reading exam.

The non-fiction writing exam: do my candidates tend to spend too long on the reading and not enough time on the writing?
- WJEC has reading and writing in separate, 1 hour exam papers.
- AQA say their new structure (2 pieces of writing in the exam – one shorter) has helped with this in the pilot GCSE.

Would we like our candidates to have the opportunity to make a multimodal response to reading?
- This is allowed by both AQA and Edexcel.

Would our candidates cope better with Shakespeare in controlled assessment or exam?
- In English, Shakespeare is in controlled assessment for all specs except Edexcel.
- In literature, Shakespeare is in controlled assessment for AQA Route A, OCR, WJEC and Edexcel.

Does our department want a lot of flexibility to ‘customise’ the controlled assessment tasks or would we prefer to have specific tasks set by the Awarding Body?
- The degree of flexibility varies from task to task.
- Overall, AQA and WJEC have the most scope for customising but do also give example tasks, which you could choose to use.
- Edexcel’s tasks are generic. You then match one of these tasks with the text you have chosen.
- OCR sets a few generic tasks, which may be applied to any text (including a set text) and a specific question for each of the set texts.

Would our candidates do well on unseen poetry in an exam?
You may like to take a skills based approach to poetry which is well-suited to helping students approach an unseen poem. All the Awarding Bodies have unseen poetry either as a compulsory element or as an option.
If you would prefer to avoid unseen poetry:
- AQA route B avoids unseen poetry but puts Shakespeare in exam.
- OCR has an unseen poetry as an option, but you can opt to do contemporary poetry set text instead.

Does our department like to make a lot of use of the film when studying Shakespeare?
- All Awarding Bodies welcome this but OCR and Edexcel controlled assessment tasks explicitly ask students to link their reading to an audio/film version.

Is it important to us to have a lot of flexibility in the choice of texts and genres?
- AQA and OCR offer a little more flexibility in how you cover the National Curriculum requirements, for example whether your literary heritage text is prose or poetry.

We hope these questions will be of help as you narrow down your choices. We’d be interested in hearing from you about your own ‘deal-makers’ and ‘deal-breakers’.

Next time we’ll be looking in more detail at controlled assessment as we know this is an area of concern for people.

EMC/GCSE 2010 Blog 6: Non-Fiction in the New Specifications

Over the next few blogs we are going to look at different points of comparison between the new specifications. We’re starting with what’s required for non-fiction reading and writing, as this is often a problematic area of assessment at GCSE. This blog will assume that you are already up-to-speed on the general issues around GCSE 2010. If not, we suggest you read at least Blog 1 before reading this one.

Non-fiction: what the specifications have in common
All the awarding bodies have a non-fiction unit that is shared by English and English Language.

Along with speaking and listening, which is also part of a shared unit in all the specifications, the non-fiction unit thus provides an important piece of ‘co-teachability’ (see Blog 5) to enable you to construct a common core course if you want to have the flexibility to make late decisions on entry for at least some of your students. You could, for example, have all students study for and sit this module in year 10, with the option for those who did not do so well to re-sit it in year 11.

Non-fiction: differences between the specifications
Edexcel is the only awarding body with a radically different approach to non-fiction as it is the only one with non-fiction assessed by controlled assessment: Unit 1, English Today.

The study of non-fiction for this unit is based on pre-release materials with a choice of two themes to choose from (each containing six texts). The themes are common to both the reading and writing elements in this unit.

Siting non-fiction in controlled assessment allows Edexcel to include onscreen digital texts – in fact three of the six pre-released texts will be digital and must be viewed onscreen. This may well be a selling point for departments keen to include a little more media in their course, as long as it survives the scrutiny of QCDA and the difficulties of obtaining copyright permissions for digital texts.

It also allows Edexcel to introduce the possibility of the Centre making their own choice of text for the reading element: students will respond to two pieces, either to two texts from the pre-release material or one from Edexcel and one of the Centre’s choice.

In writing, students will complete one controlled assessment task for a particular purpose and audience.

Something else to note is that each of the non-fiction tasks is worth 10% of the marks, meaning that non-fiction reading and writing accounts for 20% of the marks for Edexcel, rather than 40% for the other awarding bodies. Whether or not this is a selling point will depend on how well your students respond to non-fiction, of course.

The differences between the other boards are in the detail.

OCR’s non-fiction is delivered in the unit Information and Ideas: Unit A644 for English and A653 for Language. In spite of the different unit numbers (for administrative reasons) this is again a shared unit. The exam consists of two unseen pieces – one non-fiction, one media.

Students complete one writing task on a topic broadly linked to the reading material.

In AQA A’s specification, non-fiction reading and writing are assessed in Unit 1: Understanding and Producing Non-fiction. In the reading section of the exam, students respond to unseen texts. Higher tier students will answer four questions on three sources, whereas Foundation tier students will answer six questions on four shorter sources.

The writing section will ask for two tasks: a shorter task worth 16 marks and a longer task worth 24 marks. We assume this is to persuade students to spend longer on the writing tasks, rather than doing what they currently do and spending too long on the reading.

Presumably both the changes to the current Paper 1 exam (more, but shorter reading texts, two writing tasks) have been working well in the pilot phase of the new specifications.

WJEC’s Unit 1: English in the Daily World (reading) looks quite similar to OCR in that students are required to respond to two unseen texts, including media texts.

In Unit 2: English in the Daily World (writing) they complete two equally weighted tasks: transactional and discursive writing with a ‘real-life’ context.

Reading and writing are assessed in separate, one-hour exams – another way to deal with the problem of students spending too long on the reading section.

Don’t forget that we are running courses on ‘Choosing and Planning for the New GCSE Specifications for 2010’ if you’re looking for impartial advice on which spec might suit your department and students, and the chance to begin thinking about how to structure a course with the three GCSEs. 10th December is now full but there are still places on 12th January. See the courses section of our website for details: http://www.englishandmedia.co.uk.